Biology behind the term someone is ‘Not Black Enough’

Socially mixed people and black they are not considered the same which is a reflection on their biological features. This includes multi-generational multiracials, both multi-generational ‘light skin people’ aka mulattoes in the US and Somalis in the UK claim it is common for Afrikans to say that they are ‘not black enough’. This is based on what? The biological morphological traits of Afrikans which is brown to blue-black skin with Afro-textured hair. That shouldn’t be hard to figure out when I have seen first hand West Afrikans claim Somalis are not black but Afrikan Caribbeans are, despite the difference in continent and them both having chunks of their population which are admixed.

Raven-Symone, a light skin multiracial American. She is physically indistinguishable from a mulatto female showing consistent high levels of European genes and common alleles among the European contingent in her ancestry.

Iman  Abdulmajid, a Somali. She holds a hair texture consistent with heavy morphological admixture (partial or codominance in phenotype is the cause, this is something always ignored by pseudo-scientific followers), this is a common feature for people who live in the modern Northeast Afrikan Clinal Zone. A Clinal Zone is where 2 or more morphs (phenotypes) meet, Somalia and much of Northeast Afrika has seen a gradual mixture of morphs since the Kingdom of Punt.

Iman’s skin colour is not common however and is the result of bleaching. The image above is of a Somali woman who is the average complexion. The reason for Somalis hair texture yet dark skin is they contain admixture from before the current Caucasian ‘Arabs’ arrived in Arabia. There are still dark skin peoples who are aboriginal to the Arabian Desert living there, we just don’t see them on television.

Mya is a first generation mulatto (Afrikan American and Italian), she looks virtually indiscernible compared to Raven-Symone who is multi-generational. This neatly demonstrates that the two have an affinity in terms of gene expression, irrespective of the fact that she has a white parent and Raven-Symone doesn’t have one. There is no doubt they are both mixed in phenotype.

Jill Scott, an Afrikan American. She has both Afro-textured hair and is within the typical colour spectrum for Afrikans, hence she is black. If her genes are so different from Afrikans like the ‘we’re all mixed in the Americas’ crowd, then how do we explain the fact that Jill Scott’s gene expression is the same as Afrikans from the continent

The usage of admixture in arguments by negroes, their white masters and other non-blacks is worn-out and lacks scientific basis. Many peoples around the world are mixed with a minority of other groups genes. This is part of life people travel, people wage wars and raid other groups and the enslaved intermix, people get into relations with their neighbours whether black or white. This is actually explain by Clinal Zones, which many European scientists have ignored or attempted to invalidate by claiming’ we are all humans’ even though human clines originated in different places before meeting again. The usage of this false quote ignores morphological, genetic differences, with some morphs clustering closely with others who are distant geographically even with neighbouring peoples been drastically different. Morphs in all animals are the expression of genes which make up the living creature, this means the other bogus notion of ‘we are all the same under our skin’ has no scientific value. Common sense applied one could easily see that a Maasi albino, a Turkish albino, a Japanese albino and a Mayan albino would all look different with the same alleles for their skin, eye and hair colour. Even if the skin is carbon copies the gene expression is not so the overall phenotype is not the same under the skin.

 

An Afrikan American woman and South Afrikan model Thando Hopa, the two seem indistinguishable ethnically due to albinism, even though Afrikan Americans have a different blood mixture due to slavery and the jumbling of Afrikan ethnicities into a new one. Compare this to the photomontage below of other peoples with albinism, they are easily descried as different.

Both gene expression and Clinal Zones are biologically based, not IMA media propaganda based. The propaganda of IMA scientists and historians, specially, shows that the current atheist trend amongst Europeans and those that follow their culture is actually religious and political in nature and not rooted in reality. If it was, the biological points I have made out would be common knowledge to those seeking the truth not the European agitprop.

Note the ease with which to find a skin colour variation map. This is in stark polarity with finding a good map with the hair texture variation, which is the other pivotal feature in which is taken into account for race. The importance of hair texture is enormous, Afrikans have Afro-textured hair, which even in the Clinal Zone disappears by in large, this is actually enough to constitute subspecies (morphological difference based on geography which rarely ever mix due to this) but IMA’s have hidden this in plain sight. Eurocentrists claim that skull shape is the most relevant thing to race, this has partial importance but due to the fact that Afrikans have been on Earth for the longest Afrikans have all skull shapes within our collective. Something that has been noted in skulls tens of thousands of years old way before the alleles for pale skin existed.

Gene Expression is also not measured by genetic distance as nappy headed, brown and black skinned individuals exist in the Indian and Pacific ocean islands. On top of that the Afrikan people (not ‘Sub-Saharan Afrikans’ another IMA falsity) contain over 80% of the world’s human genetic diversity. This also proves another lie by IMA’s to be false that genetic diversity is due to distance Afrika takes up 20.3% of the world’s land masses but an astonishingly overbalanced percentage of genes.

Afrikans morphological traits can survive admixture, which is a point I have NEVER heard raised by idiots who love to say how we are all mixed. Afrikans ithe Americas should easily expose this reality; many Afrikans in Cuba, in Grenada, in Belize , in the United States are known to have ancestry mixed with Europeans, Asian migrants known as American Indians and even East Asian indentured workers during and after slavery to a slight degree. This has however not caused unequivocal differences in phenotype which is not compatible with that of the Afrikans in the motherland. Many people in the motherland have a few ancestors who were non-Afrikan, this has not changed their morphs either. This fact clearly negates the excuse of those with multiracial phenotypes, as the admixture in other groups is minimal enough to not transmute into a different physical composition (phenotype). Nowhere near all Afrikans in the Western Hemisphere or in the motherland is mixed in ancestry.

Ben Carson is exemplary of genetic pollution from previous generations. He still retains the skin colour and hair texture but due to past events in his ancestry he has a straight European style nose, demonstrating admixture but absorption not admixture and metamorphosis. The higher proportion of brown skin blacks in the Americas is also due to genetic pollution, this is the effects from slavery on Afrikans not some Jesse Williams mulatto or multi-generational mulatto like Ice-T.

The mixing of genes, not massively altering the phenotype is a sign of natural selection taking place, which is one of the most well known laws of biology. ‘Gene replacement instead can be completely gradual. A classic example of gene replacement are Black Americans (not represented in the tree of Fig. 3 which includes on aboriginal people), who notoriously have a lighter skin color than Black Africans, their ancestors. This is especially true in the northern States. Genetic analysis shows that African Americans have on average 30% of their gene pool from European (White American) genes (28). This partial replacement took place over about 300 years of contact, and it is calculated that, if it was constant time, there must have been 3% of mixed unions per generation. Laws assured that the child of mixed parentage would be considered Black. Only individuals with a very low proportion of Black ancestry (or of skin color) would be able to “pass” as White. With the gene flow continuing at that same rate only 30% of that gene constitution would remain after 1000 years since the beginning and 9% after 2000 years. (1)’ Excerpt from Genetics and the Origin of Species: From Darwin to Molecular Biology, 60 years after Dobzhansky. The book was released in 1997 and was a form of an update on the work of Theodosius Dobzhansky a Ukrainian born American biologist (then Ukraine was Russian land) who formulated much of the modern evolutionary synthesis which is the regulated and organised names and terms for biology and is crucial to the current evolution theory belief system, which is based on his work not Darwin’s theories. Theodosius Dobzhansky wrote the Genetics and the Origin of Species in 1937. Gene Replacement is the important  to our morphology, if a group has a profoundly mixed history and in turn ancestry the genes of the minority populations would not be pushed out of the populations gene pool. This in turn has an impact on the Gene Expression of the given population, as is noted in population genetics. Population genetics looks into the frequency of alleles (versions of genes) in a geographical population, this explains clines of hues and physical features regulated by geographical proximity and population movement.

                     

We must do our research as ACBN’s. Looking in-depth at the biological mechanisms behind our phenotype. Terrible media driven arguments are a rife, almost uncontrollable and are signals that most people in the West claiming atheism and anti-religiousness are nothing more than coverts to this new Europeans political humanist  and not in scientific backed reality. The difference between Afrikans and other groups is not just socially rooted but genetically and ancestrally. If we do not establish a socio-political usage to our genetic based morphological difference our identity can easily be manipulated with detrimental reverberations.