Unsurprisingly negroes who follow Europeans are now no longer dreaming of integrating as black people into European society, because they know we can’t. The sudden change of heart was spurred by their seeing of the outright rejection of other ethnicities of whites in Europe and mestizos in the USA . Black people are the phenotypical antithesis of Europeans and historically, prior to every other group, has been associated with negativity by Europeans. This backlash has hit negroes the hardest. The solution in these idiots minds is to create a new population of multiracials, even though the ones coming from Mexico and Central America to the USA are scapegoated as the catalyst for Euro-American ethnocentrism, xenophobia and racism.
The ‘solution’ of course was instigated by the European mass media aka the 1% richest whites, in their bid to deal with a historical ‘Negro Problem’ they had been documenting since enslavement and immigration post-empire in Western Europe. For multi-racial societies there were originally two disparate ways of dealing with this problem by the white establishment; despite been seemingly different they both REQUIRED miscegenation. Negroes often want to forget it is quoted as the ‘Negro Problem’ (negro at the time, and still today in Romance languages, means Afrikan/black people in general) not mulatto problem or mixed race problem, the creation of mixed people has ALWAYS been a favourable outcome, so pushing a ‘mixed race future’ or ‘coffee coloured future’ is not actually eroding white dominance despite mainstream black discourse on the topic. The whole idea of breeding out whites ignores the fact brown and dark skin black with kinky hair would disappear too by mixing, hence the coffee coloured saying about mixed nations like Brazil, coffee mixed with milk looks, tastes and is nothing like chemically milk or coffee separately. Nobody would consider Brazil a black or white society in the same vein.
The ‘Negro Problem’ was never resolved in mono-racial societies. Nations such as Jamaica and Grenada and areas such as the rainforest section of the Pacific Coast of Colombia which are still overwhelmingly Afrikan in population never even established ‘Negro Problem’ solutions at all. The Europeans who ran these places simply held onto colonial and/or governmental authority by suppressing constant violent revolts by the black masses with armed forces and simply fled when colonialism ended. Unlike these loci the Negro Problem arose in place like the USA and Brazil where the two ‘resolutions’ were offered.
The American answer was the ‘one drop rule’ where the population created by mixing with Afrikans were classified as black it served several functions and has an ongoing legacy today. It first and foremost established the devaluing of black people (our phenotype and image of ourselves, or what we would prefer ourselves to look like as well as identity confusion). It installs the fact that mulattoes are not white, are not part of the white community and can not take on the wealth of the white community. The most relevant for the ‘Negro Problem’ is that it infuses blacks with high levels of European genes which is detrimental for separating and building independently, this also has an impact on the overall number of blacks because in their place are many mulattoes, griffes and multiracials who are openly stated as not been part of the ‘Negro Problem’. The growing number of mixed people infesting the ‘black community’ was compounded by external European migration, severely reducing the percentage of the population that was black, limiting the the ‘problem’.
The Brazilians panacea was to create as many multiracials as possible. All sorts of admixtures were encouraged with a large dose of European admixture. Millions of Europeans, from Iberia, from Germany, from Northern Italy, from Poland and even a million plus pale skin Levantine people descended onto Brazil post-slavery. They were encouraged socially and incentivised to mix with blacks, but not on an equal social footing. This led to the wholesale reduction of the Afrikan population with low social value on those people, their phenotype, their disappearance and growing powerlessness due to it. The same technique was utilised throughout much of Latin America.
As we can see most negroes are in with the camp of one of these two slave masters. Neither one is going to help Afrikans or else whites would not have directly established them as techniques for removing us/reducing our influence. The idea that socially negative, economically depressed black people can intermix, integrate and miscenginate into a mixed future on an equilibrium is false. Looking at the way Dominicans come to New York City and talk down on blacks, choose to dissociate from blacks, this should show easy warning signs to any aware black person that mixing from a position of weakness is opposed to black people getting along with these multiracials in the long run. The dream by negroes of a coffee coloured reality was smashed by the ancestor Amos Wilson who spoke on how society will stratify itself and when the time comes right mixed people will have their own category, maintain their own lineage by breeding with one another and are unlikely to engulf everyone. Amos Wilson claimed that looking at Coloured people in South Afrika should give black people in the West an idea on what is in store if you keep on mixing. Both in openly racist South Afrika and in covertly racist Puerto Rico mixed people are not considered black or white and look dissimilar to either the Afrikan or the European but share traits with other mixed populations around the world. The weak socio-economic position filters into mixed people, with no ability to fund positive images and influences from the black side of the mixture we see breeding patterns such as ‘whitening the race’ concepts in Brazil, Dominican Republic, Cuba ect. We also see concepts of blacks been viewed as other or outside like in South Afrika with mixed people clustering closely with Boers on most major political issues and the Dominican Republic coming down heavy on Afro-Haitians and Afro-Dominicans meanwhile ignoring the control on the industry tourism by Europeans and the Chinese (whom most aren’t even related to). The beauty standard another politicised concept is heavily assaulted through mixture with mixed people preferring with no question curly and straighter and virtually excluding dark skin mixed people from the debate and many times their social circles. This even though they are mixed and those features exist among the multiracial population there.
Sarge WP speaking on mixing and how it has not helped black people. He is often on point, especially on attacking the one drop rule. I don’t agree with the stuff about white poor people been ‘tricked’ into identifying with rich whites when they came over with the culture of classism from Europe. White elites came out of the poor whites and will go back into it when they become too weak as a collective. He is speaking on mixed peoples role in white hegemony (associating with the winners), their own independently fostered hatred of blacks, their breeding patterns and the false notion of mixed people been ‘colourblind’.
Here is proof of what he is talking about in the UK.
This person has littered their post with false stats pushed by the media. Caribbeans are not growing due to race mixing is the most prominent one. Afro-Caribbeans have suffered in growth mainly due to the blockage of immigration by the UK government. Second of all due to been in the UK for several generation (40’s and 50’s was a major immigration period for West Indians) many of them don’t identify with the Caribbean and choose to claim Black British (notice Black is a FIXED identity and doesn’t change regardless of nationality), Black British comes under ‘Black Other’ on the UK census and they make up 80% plus of Black Other people. Black British is the second fastest growing ethnicity in the UK, fastest been Black Afrikan. Black Caribbean add Black Other is 1.4% of the UK population, Black Afrikans are 1.6% and Mixed Black Caribbean and White are 0.4% of the UK population. Mulattoes overall make up 0.6%, Mixed Asian* and White accounts for 0.4% and Mixed Other and White is 0.2% of the UK. The fastest growing mixed population is Black Afrikan and White, followed by Asian and White, next is Other Mixed, then a stagnating Black Caribbean and White population as they integrate with whites as the poster suggested. A significant number of Caribbeans have returned to the West Indies in retirement and many have immigrated to the USA, with 1% of black people in the USA originating in Europe. A stronghold of British-born Afro-Caribbeans is in New York City with more Afro-Caribbean immigrating from Britain than immigrating into Britain between 2001 and 2011. There is also no way to accurately guess dating patterns across a whole nation, only marriage, well over half of Caribbean families in the UK are single mother homes, showing dating, child birth and marriage are not all the same or indicators of the same patterns. Mulattoes have a very high rate of single mother homes on top of that over 80% of those who marry, which is under 60% of them overall, are with white British partners. Mixed people account for over 45% of interracial marriages in the United Kingdom, which explains the slow growth of Mixed Black Caribbean and White people and Other Mixed people.
Breeding patterns of mixed people exposed for negroes who want to talk about breeding out whites.
Great questions by this mulatto. This is what’s up? Mixed people in their own circles exposing themselves and their negro parents, a feeling of resentment is clearly showing that many blacks are willingly helping the segue of mixed people (as Sarge WP coined) between blacks and whites. Psychological problems are highlighted as a possible reason for their strong bias towards mixing with whites, although clearly the social issue of black social inferiority has a significant impression on their choices.
What is interesting to see is also that Asian and White multiracials are not promoted by the mainstream media, even though their growth is flying and mulattoes growth is becoming sluggish (showing that the ‘Negro Problem’ is been solved by whites by mixing unlike how they seek to deal with Asians). This is due to Asians proliferating in more spread out regions across the UK in places where Afrikan people make up around or below than 1%. A few examples – Blackburn with Darwen, a local authority composed of Blackburn a town and Darwen a nearby small market town the population is around 150,000, 27% Asian and 0.6% black and 0.7% Mixed Asian and White. Dewsbury a former church town composed of just under 70,000 people is 32% Asian and 0.4% black. Rochdale a large market town of approximately just over 100,000, it is 27% Asian and 1.5% black.
Repetition of what happened to the Australian Aborigines. Clearly defining the social position of blacks been a decisive factor against returning to the the black lineage versus becoming absorbed by whites British people who barely race mix due to sheer numbers and geographic spread having communities in the most sparse of areas.
Another example of negro clowns and their mixed offspring. Black people claiming they can breed out whites yet mixed people DO NOT CARE ABOUT THAT and ARE NOT ATTEMPTING TO DO THAT, clearly showing they either are not raised by these black male parents or their black parents regardless of gender are really hardcore integrationalists. As Sarge WP pointed out, lack of black organisation, lack of successful black community makes it much easier or ambiguous-looking multiracial descendants to affiliate with whites.
Well it is settled, the ambiguous, identityless, mixed community cares not whether they exist to fulfil the media prophecy of a mixed future, this individual is literally a stand-alone figure who cares about the preservation of mixed people without white support. Populations like the mestizo population in El Salvador or mulattoes in the creole culture in Louisiana got their kickstart and concept of their ethnic identity from whites.
Interesting to see the upper post is doing what Sarge pointed out black people don’t do, look into future generations and the bloodline that they are breeding into (it’s a conscious choice). They are taking up for white descendants of theirs already, even claiming their blood is mixed which they have always known and DNA testing with all it’s inaccuracies and the scientists with their biases have found all manner of gene markers from North Afrika, Central Afrika, Arabia, as far as China in Scottish samples. This smacks in the face of the false narrative many blacks who defend the one drop rule like to abide by, the idea whites are ‘untainted’ which excuses their defence of mixed people fraudulently claiming black but never white. The very last post is still not replied to, by poster hummingbird, questions the legitimacy of the view that mixed people are a product if social integration, acceptance of multiculturalism (which is actually in opposition of integration but that’s for another time) and love-filled miscegenation.
I still want to know where is this place where multiracials and black get along 100% fine, as far as I know the relationship is just a turbulent as with whites. Black people your power comes from within, mixing is not the solution, self-loathing is not the solution, integrating is not the solution, economic empowerment, positive socialisation and social organisation is the solution to our modern day ‘Negro Problem’. Negroes are a problem, their behaviour, rationalisations and socialisation must be pushed out of the black community.
*Asian in the United Kingdom refers solely to South Asians (Indian Subcontinent). Rarely it can refer to the Chinese who have their own box. Most times the Chinese are lumped in with ‘Other Asian’ e.g. Filipinos, Persians or the Nepalese or just ‘Other’ which is for minor ethnicities from all over the world, not just Asia such as multiracial Brazilians, Australian Aborigines ect. (all ethnicities I have met in London). ‘Arabs’ have made a campaign and now are recognised as their own ethnicity on the census, neither Asian nor Afrikan in spite of geographic origin.